🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar debates in other EU countries